misc104824
Glasgow v Northumberland
Northumberland in Scotland 1892
VenueTitwood, Glasgow on 19th, 20th May 1892 (2-day match)
Balls per over5
TossNorthumberland won the toss and decided to bat
ResultMatch drawn
Close of play day 1Glasgow (1) 35/4 (Williams 11*, Paterson 2*)

Northumberland first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
D Booklessb Scott43  2- 
SW Andersonc Walton b Scott16     
SP Woodc Cowan b Rolleston0     
W Elliottb Scott2     
TF Latimerst Paterson b Williams23     
G Simpsonc and b Scott0     
*SJ Crawfordb Scott19     
H Shottonnot out40     
G Robsonb Walton21     
CL Latimerrun out0     
D Nicholc McLeod b Rolleston0     
Extras19
Total(all out, 79.3 overs)183
Fall of wickets:
1-39, 2-39, 3-62, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-183 (79.3 ov)
Glasgow bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Scott37   12585--
Rolleston20   9352--
Cowan6.30240--
Walton6   1241--
Williams5   1131--
Roberts5   2100--

Glasgow first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
W Williamsb Nichol13     
AA Robertsb Simpson3     
JA Allanb Simpson0     
S McDougallb Nichol17     
TC McLeodb Nichol0     
+TS Patersonc Shotton b CL Latimer5     
TT Cowanb CL Latimer5     
H Rollestonlbw b Nichol1     
WM Walkernot out2     
S Waltonb Nichol0     
R Scottb Nichol3     
Extras4
Total(all out)53
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-53
Northumberland bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Nichol???6--
Simpson???2--
CL Latimer???2--

Glasgow second innings (following on)RunsBallsMins4s6s
WM Walkerc and b Bookless22     
H Rollestonretired hurt5     
S McDougallc Elliott b Bookless17     
JA Allanc Nichol b Bookless8     
W Williamsc [unknown] b Robson11     
AA Robertsnot out8     
R Scottnot out3     
TC McLeoddid not bat      
+TS Patersondid not bat      
TT Cowandid not bat      
S Waltondid not bat      
Extras4
Total(4 wickets)78
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-75, 4-78
Northumberland bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Bookless???3--
Robson???1--

In the Glasgow and District Second innings, W Williams was caught by Latimer but it is not known which one took the catch